首页 诗词 字典 板报 句子 名言 友答 励志 学校 网站地图
当前位置: 首页 > 教程频道 > 软件管理 > 软件架构设计 >

Spring中JDK动态署理和CGLIB动态代理的性能比较

2012-06-29 
Spring中JDK动态代理和CGLIB动态代理的性能比较新项目开始之前领导让研究下公司原有的框架(基于struts1.2.

Spring中JDK动态代理和CGLIB动态代理的性能比较
    新项目开始之前领导让研究下公司原有的框架(基于struts1.2.9+spring2.0.6),比较古老了。读service基类时发现竟然将request穿透到了service层(request为BaseService的实例变量),这样service就变成了有状态Bean,使service层变成了非线程安全,导致用Spring容器管理service的时候不得不使用prototype的scope
    我们知道,service由于要做事务的包装,需要创建代理对象,spring中使用JDK动态代理或者CGLIB动态代理来创建代理对象,据说JDK动态代理创建对象的时间快于CGLIB,但是性能比CGLIB差(接下来我会测试这个观点),所以我得出以下结论:
1.spring在bean的scope为prototype的情况下,因为是延迟实例化bean,所以最好使用JDK的API创建代理对象;
2.反之对于singleton对象,spring默认是容器启动时就初始化bean,最好使用CGLIB来创建对象

把service配置成singleton我觉得性能方面显然要更好些,如果非要将request穿透到service层,是不是可以考虑用ThreadLocal?

在测试之前,我们先确定spring是以什么方式使用JDK动态代理和CGLIB的,如图:
JDK动态代理:



CGLIB动态代理:


接下来对测试下JDK动态代理和CGLIB动态代理的性能(CGLIB测试代码也和spring一样使用MethodInterceptor)

先贴上测试代码

public interface CountService {    int count();}

public class CountServiceImpl implements CountService {    private int count = 0;        public int count() {        return ++count;    }}

import java.io.File;import java.io.FileNotFoundException;import java.io.FileOutputStream;import java.io.IOException;import java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler;import java.lang.reflect.Method;import java.lang.reflect.Proxy;import java.text.DecimalFormat;import net.sf.cglib.core.DefaultGeneratorStrategy;import net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer;import net.sf.cglib.proxy.MethodInterceptor;import net.sf.cglib.proxy.MethodProxy;@SuppressWarnings("unused")public class DynamicProxyPerformanceTest {        public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {        CountService delegate = new CountServiceImpl();                long time = System.currentTimeMillis();        CountService jdkProxy = createJdkDynamicProxy(delegate);        time = System.currentTimeMillis() - time;        System.out.println("Create JDK Proxy: " + time + " ms");                time = System.currentTimeMillis();        CountService cglibProxy = createCglibDynamicProxy(delegate);        time = System.currentTimeMillis() - time;        System.out.println("Create CGLIB Proxy: " + time + " ms");                for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {            test(jdkProxy, "Run JDK Proxy: ");            test(cglibProxy, "Run CGLIB Proxy: ");            System.out.println("-------------------");        }    }        private static void test(CountService service, String label) throws Exception {        service.count(); // warm up        int count = 10000000;        long time = System.currentTimeMillis();        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {            service.count();        }        time = System.currentTimeMillis() - time;        System.out.println(label + time + " ms, " + new DecimalFormat().format(count * 1000 / time) + " t/s");    }        private static CountService createJdkDynamicProxy(final CountService delegate) {        CountService jdkProxy = (CountService) Proxy.newProxyInstance(ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader(),                new Class[] { CountService.class }, new JdkHandler(delegate));                // 反汇编字节码用,测试的时候注释掉这段代码,不然影响测试结果        // 下面一行代码参照java.lang.reflect.Proxy//        byte[] proxyClassFile =//                sun.misc.ProxyGenerator.generateProxyClass(//                        jdkProxy.getClass().getName(), jdkProxy.getClass().getInterfaces());//        try {//            FileOutputStream fos =//                    new FileOutputStream(new File(jdkProxy.getClass().getName() + ".class"));//            fos.write(proxyClassFile, 0, proxyClassFile.length);//        } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {//            e.printStackTrace();//        } catch (IOException e) {//            e.printStackTrace();//        }        return jdkProxy;    }        private static class JdkHandler implements InvocationHandler {                final Object delegate;                JdkHandler(Object delegate) {            this.delegate = delegate;        }                public Object invoke(Object object, Method method, Object[] objects) throws Throwable {            return method.invoke(delegate, objects);        }    }        private static CountService createCglibDynamicProxy(final CountService delegate) throws Exception {        Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer();        enhancer.setSuperclass(CountServiceImpl.class);        enhancer.setCallback(new MethodInterceptor() {            @Override            public Object intercept(Object obj, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy proxy) throws Throwable {                return proxy.invokeSuper(obj, args);            }        });        CountServiceImpl cglibProxy = (CountServiceImpl) enhancer.create();        // 反汇编字节码用,测试的时候注释掉这段代码,不然影响测试结果        // 下面一行代码参照net.sf.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator类中byte[] b = strategy.generate(this);//        byte[] proxyClassFile = new DefaultGeneratorStrategy().generate(enhancer);//        try {//            FileOutputStream fos =//                    new FileOutputStream(new File(cglibProxy.getClass().getName() + ".class"));//            fos.write(proxyClassFile, 0, proxyClassFile.length);//        } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {//            e.printStackTrace();//        } catch (IOException e) {//            e.printStackTrace();//        }        return cglibProxy;    }}


数据为执行三次,每次调用一千万次代理方法的结果
测试环境1:
JDK:fastdebug1.6
CGLIB:和spring2.0.6 使用同样的cglib-nodep-2.1_3.jar
CPU:P8400 2.53GHz 2.53GHz
测试结果1:
Create JDK Proxy: 13 msCreate CGLIB Proxy: 201 msRun JDK Proxy: 1571 ms, 897,559 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 824 ms, 1,711,244 t/s-------------------Run JDK Proxy: 1519 ms, 928,285 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 576 ms, 2,448,030 t/s-------------------Run JDK Proxy: 1546 ms, 912,073 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 590 ms, 2,389,941 t/s-------------------

CGLIB创建代理对象速度大概比JDK Proxy慢15倍,执行速度是JDK Proxy的2倍左右

测试环境2:
JDK:fastdebug1.7
CGLIB:和spring2.0.6 使用同样的cglib-nodep-2.1_3.jar
CPU:P8400 2.53GHz 2.53GHz
测试结果2:
Create JDK Proxy: 14 msCreate CGLIB Proxy: 204 msRun JDK Proxy: 1608 ms, 876,906 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 529 ms, 2,665,530 t/s-------------------Run JDK Proxy: 1591 ms, 886,276 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 405 ms, 3,481,642 t/s-------------------Run JDK Proxy: 1624 ms, 868,266 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 405 ms, 3,481,642 t/s-------------------

CGLIB创建代理对象速度大概比JDK Proxy慢15倍,执行速度是JDK Proxy的4倍左右

测试环境3:
JDK:jdk1.6.0_21
CGLIB:和spring2.0.6 使用同样的cglib-nodep-2.1_3.jar
CPU:P8400 2.53GHz 2.53GHz
测试结果3:
Create JDK Proxy: 8 msCreate CGLIB Proxy: 99 msRun JDK Proxy: 911 ms, 1,547,821 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 435 ms, 3,241,529 t/s-------------------Run JDK Proxy: 870 ms, 1,620,764 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 399 ms, 3,533,998 t/s-------------------Run JDK Proxy: 894 ms, 1,577,254 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 404 ms, 3,490,260 t/s-------------------

CGLIB创建代理对象速度大概比JDK Proxy慢10倍以上,执行速度是JDK Proxy的2倍左右

测试环境4:
JDK:jdk1.7.0_02
CGLIB:和spring2.0.6 使用同样的cglib-nodep-2.1_3.jar
CPU:P8400 2.53GHz 2.53GHz
测试结果4:
Create JDK Proxy: 43 msCreate CGLIB Proxy: 129 msRun JDK Proxy: 940 ms, 1,500,069 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 299 ms, 4,715,937 t/s-------------------Run JDK Proxy: 921 ms, 1,531,015 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 269 ms, 5,241,878 t/s-------------------Run JDK Proxy: 932 ms, 1,512,945 t/sRun CGLIB Proxy: 265 ms, 5,321,001 t/s-------------------

CGLIB创建代理对象速度大概比JDK Proxy慢3倍,执行速度是JDK Proxy的3倍以上

字节码比较:
把测试代码中被注释的部分打开,生成class文件后执行javap -c 类名
JDK动态代理生成的字节码
  public final int count() throws ;    Code:       0: aload_0              1: getfield      #16                 // Field java/lang/reflect/Proxy.h:Ljava/lang/reflect/InvocationHandler;       4: aload_0              5: getstatic     #50                 // Field m3:Ljava/lang/reflect/Method;       8: aconst_null          9: invokeinterface #28,  4           // InterfaceMethod java/lang/reflect/InvocationHandler.invoke:(Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/reflect/Method;[Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;      14: checkcast     #52                 // class java/lang/Integer      17: invokevirtual #55                 // Method java/lang/Integer.intValue:()I      20: ireturn             21: athrow              22: astore_1            23: new           #42                 // class java/lang/reflect/UndeclaredThrowableException      26: dup                 27: aload_1             28: invokespecial #45                 // Method java/lang/reflect/UndeclaredThrowableException."<init>":(Ljava/lang/Throwable;)V      31: athrow            Exception table:       from    to  target type           0    21    21   Class java/lang/Error           0    21    21   Class java/lang/RuntimeException           0    21    22   Class java/lang/Throwable


CGLIB生成的字节码:
  public final int count();    Code:       0: aload_0              1: getfield      #37                 // Field CGLIB$CALLBACK_0:Lnet/sf/cglib/proxy/MethodInterceptor;       4: dup                  5: ifnonnull     17       8: pop                  9: aload_0             10: invokestatic  #41                 // Method CGLIB$BIND_CALLBACKS:(Ljava/lang/Object;)V      13: aload_0             14: getfield      #37                 // Field CGLIB$CALLBACK_0:Lnet/sf/cglib/proxy/MethodInterceptor;      17: dup                 18: ifnull        52      21: aload_0             22: getstatic     #43                 // Field CGLIB$count$0$Method:Ljava/lang/reflect/Method;      25: getstatic     #45                 // Field CGLIB$emptyArgs:[Ljava/lang/Object;      28: getstatic     #47                 // Field CGLIB$count$0$Proxy:Lnet/sf/cglib/proxy/MethodProxy;      31: invokeinterface #53,  5           // InterfaceMethod net/sf/cglib/proxy/MethodInterceptor.intercept:(Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/reflect/Method;[Ljava/lang/Object;Lnet/sf/cglib/proxy/MethodProxy;)Ljava/lang/Object;      36: dup                 37: ifnonnull     45      40: pop                 41: iconst_0            42: goto          51      45: checkcast     #55                 // class java/lang/Number      48: invokevirtual #58                 // Method java/lang/Number.intValue:()I      51: ireturn             52: aload_0             53: invokespecial #35                 // Method CountServiceImpl.count:()I      56: ireturn       



本文参照了 http://javatar.iteye.com/blog/814426

热点排行